Thursday 27 June 2013

Lions 2013: James Horwill intervention by International Rugby Board angers ...


“This is an unprecedented step taken by the IRB in what is the most

important rugby event staged in Australia since the 2003 Rugby World Cup,”

Pulver said, in a statement.



“While we respect the right of the IRB to intervene, we also respect the

knowledge and experience of appointed – and independent – judicial officers,

and their expertise to consider evidence and reach sound findings.



“James Horwill was cleared of the stamping charge as per the IRB’s

established judicial process.



“We are surprised and disappointed that the finding of Mr Hampton

(judicial officer) is now not only under question, but deemed to be

‘erroneous’.



“In the midst of an extraordinarily successful series that has been 12

years in the making, the re-hearing process – not even taking into

consideration the possible outcomes – has the potential to cause serious

disruption to the Wallabies and the positive atmosphere surrounding the

tour.



“The ARU in no way condones foul play.



“However, the process was followed according to IRB regulations and the

decision of an independent judicial officer handed down. What has occurred

subsequently is without precedent.”



Television replays showed Queensland Reds lock Horwill bring his right boot

down on to the head of Jones, who was lying at the bottom of a ruck and

later needed stitches above his left eye.



The Lions subsequently referred the incident to the match citing officer, but

Horwill escaped punishment from independent judicial officer, New Zealander

Nigel Hampton QC, amid a chorus of disbelief that he was not suspended.



The IRB has now confirmed its appeal stance to the ARU following what it

described as an extensive review of the case.



In a statement, the IRB said: “As the 2013 Lions tour falls within the

scope of the IRB merit-based appointment scheme approved by the IRB Council,

the IRB has the right to appeal any decision arising from matches under the

scheme.



“Furthermore, given its duty to preserve player welfare at all levels of

the game, the IRB is compelled to further examine potential acts of foul

play which either potentially or in reality impact on the preservation of

player welfare.



“It is important for the IRB to ensure amongst all stakeholders in the

game that there is full confidence that priority is given to player welfare

and the values of the game.”



Speaking today before the IRB’s appeal was announced, Wallabies coach Robbie

Deans applauded the decision to clear Horwill.



“I’ve had a lot of experience in these processes and I was part of this

process and privy to it,” Deans said.



“I can’t discuss it publicly for obvious reasons, but we were satisfied

with the process and felt it was just and fair.”



Under regulation 17.22.2, the IRB has the right to appeal disciplinary

decisions, but it has never invoked the rule for a not-guilty verdict.



Its only previous intervention led to New Zealand forward Adam Thomson having

a one-week ban – also imposed for stamping – increased to two weeks last

November on appeal from the IRB.



(Edited by Nick Pearce)


Article source: http://www.express.co.uk/sport/rugbyunion/406219/Corbisiero-handed-Lions-debut




Lions 2013: James Horwill intervention by International Rugby Board angers ...

No comments:

Post a Comment